en
Español
中國人
Tiếng Việt
Deutsch
Українська
Português
Français
भारतीय
Türkçe
한국인
Italiano
Gaeilge
اردو
Indonesia
Polski Most intermediary servers can be purchased or rented out for personal use, but there is another method – shared proxies. They are different from private solutions used for business in that they incorporate several users at the same time. Shared ones are important for many people who work within the fields of data scraping, marketing automation, or data mining. This type is optimal where cost is more important than having a dedicated connection. So what is a shared proxy? We will find it out in detail in this article and consider its usefulness.
The fundamental principle of operation for shared proxies, also known as public ones, involves multiple users sharing one or more IPs. This model relies on an IP pool – a collection of addresses that traffic is routed through. Every client connects through one of the available IPs and then makes requests. The proxy server sends the request to the target resource and claims to be the user, thus masking the person’s real IP.
Load balancing distributes traffic among users. The server monitors activity and evenly distributes the flow based on certain conditions. Depending on the configuration, a single IP may be assigned a fixed number of sessions or a general cap on requests and speed.
Providers of such types of servers tend to set limits in place to avoid abuse and to ensure that all users have acceptable quality of service. These may be in the form of:
For some purposes, the IP pool is refreshed from time to time to lower the chances of being banned by the desired endpoints. To illustrate, consider two primary classes of such servers.
There are two primary classes – IPv4 and mobile. Both imply usage of a shared IP by multiple subscribers but differ in technical aspects, level of credibility from websites, and attributes of common user activities.
These are classic datacenter proxies based on static IPv4 addresses belonging to a particular server. These IP addresses are usually used, which means that they might have some browsing history, and they might also be partially listed with some filters (dependent on usage). Providers tend to distribute pools of these IPs among clients, placing a cap on the number of concurrent sessions or requests. These IPs are affordable and widely available, making them useful for basic tasks such as testing and interacting with platforms that lack sophisticated anti-fraud systems.
With the use of cellular 3G/4G/5G networks are mobile intermediary servers. They provide the real, unique IPs that one can access. Trust in mobile IPs is significantly higher, making them more suitable for sensitive scenarios such as:
Mobile IP pools are made available by service providers through special gateways. Addresses may rotate automatically or change based on a specified time interval. Although shared among users, these are strengthened goals that require heightened anonymity and circumvention of multi-tiered secured environments. Such IP allocation depends on mobile carriers and the proxy providers, which gives these users certain control over the SIM cards’ mobile network operators. It makes them one of the best shared proxies options.
All in all, the economical and versatile option is the IPv4 shared proxy server, while the mobile ones offer stronger reliability under harsh access conditions and are more stable.
As discussed earlier, they cater to diverse industries needing a consolidated volume of repeating tasks done with varying IP addresses. They serve best in situations where there is a need for scaling and cost efficiency at the same time.
They are also generally cheap and scalable and therefore easily available. These advantages make them easy for beginners who want to test the provided tools or simply launch basic workflows before a huge monetary commitment. Wherever static IPs are not compulsory, shared ones are one of the most rational solutions.
When you use a shared proxy, avoid handling critical or sensitive tasks. For example, managing multiple social media accounts with automation on a shared proxy can lead to bans or security issues. Instead, reserve shared proxies for less risky activities like casual browsing or data scraping.
Always monitor your shared proxy for signs of trouble. Look out for IP bans, frequent captchas, and traffic throttling. Use proxy monitoring tools to track connection status and response times. Automation tools like BrightData’s Proxy Manager can help you detect issues early.
For CAPTCHA challenges, integrate solvers such as 2Captcha or Anti-Captcha to reduce delays. Keep logs of your proxy performance regularly. This lets you see trends and spot problems before they disrupt your tasks.
Prepare a backup plan. When a shared proxy becomes unreliable or slow, switch smoothly to another proxy. Use failover mechanisms or automatic proxy cycling scripts like ProxyBroker or PyProxy to do this without manual work. This keeps your operations running continuously. As your project grows, plan to upgrade to private or dedicated proxies. They offer better speed and security when you need them.
Integrate shared proxies easily with automation frameworks like Selenium or Puppeteer by configuring proxy settings during browser setup. Test your proxies regularly using tools such as Proxy Checker or simple online services like WhatIsMyIP. These help confirm your proxy’s IP integrity and connection speed, reducing the risk of failures.
Here’s a quick checklist to follow when using shared proxies:
Such options might be inexpensive, but they are not ideal for all users or their respective use cases. The providers impose restrictions that user-level operations involving sensitive data or constant connection would need to consider. Some risks include:
Users might need to identify their current address due to frequent changes associated with such a type. Online tools to check your IP may be used in this case. Such a client might only need to visit service pages for basic IP information.
From the aspect of protecting the user’s identity when using shared proxies, one needs to:
If enduring proxy stability and absolute separation are important to you, then dedicated private options might cater better to fulfill your needs and priorities.
Using shared proxies comes with notable risks.
To minimize these problems, choose a reliable provider like Proxy-Seller. Their shared proxy offering covers 220+ countries with speeds up to 1 Gbps and 99% uptime. This reduces common issues of slow speed and downtime seen in cheap shared proxies. Proxy-Seller’s IP addresses come from real users and ISPs, ensuring better IP reputation and fewer blacklisting risks. They support both HTTP(S) and SOCKS5 protocols, with username/password and IP whitelist authentication options. This flexibility boosts security compared to generic shared proxies.
They provide 24/7/365 customer support and offer quick proxy replacement or refunds within 24 hours. This gives you a reliable safety net if your proxy runs into trouble.
Use Proxy-Seller’s user-friendly dashboard and API to monitor proxy performance and enable automatic proxy cycling. Regularly test your shared proxies with their integrated proxy-check tools to verify IP integrity and speed. This practice helps you avoid service disruptions and reduces the frequency of CAPTCHAs.
In summary, shared proxies work well for low-risk tasks if you manage their limitations carefully. Always monitor performance, prepare for failures, and consider upgrading as your needs grow. Using a reputable provider like Proxy-Seller will help you navigate these risks with better speed, security, and support.
You’ll find that shared proxies differ significantly from private and dedicated proxies.
Shared proxies cost less because the price is divided among multiple users accessing the same IP address. This makes them cheap shared proxy options suitable for budgets or low-intensity projects. However, they involve risks like slower speeds or IP reputation problems caused by other users.
| Proxy Type | Cost | Speed | Security/Stability | IP Exclusivity | Risk of IP Bans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shared datacenter proxy | Low | Moderate | Lower | No | Higher |
| Private proxy | Higher | Better | Better | Yes | Lower |
| Dedicated proxy | Highest | Top | Highest | Yes | Lowest |
Popular providers like Massive, Smartproxy, and Oxylabs offer monthly plans and per-GB pricing that reflect these differences. For example, a shared data center proxy plan might cost 70% less than a dedicated proxy for the same bandwidth.
When choosing, consider a balance of risks and benefits: if your work needs anonymity and speed, private or dedicated proxies outperform shared options. But for basic or short-term projects, a cheap shared proxy can be cost-effective.
Also, consider residential versus datacenter proxies when evaluating shared or private options. Residential proxies offer better IP masking but usually cost more than datacenter shared proxies.
The use of such intermediaries aids in tackling practical problems while striking a well-balanced ratio of cost to functionality. Their appeal to novice users and budget-heavy projects is unquestionable. Nonetheless, users must bear in mind constraints such as IP blacklisting, unreliable speed, and degradation of service from other participants within the pool. These proxies should not be used for situations where full anonymity is required.
Equally important is the provider’s credibility, as it influences the quality of the IP pool, the distribution of traffic, and the level of support provided to the user. When used correctly, shared proxies become a powerful tool for scaling basic operations at a lower cost.
Comments: 0