en
Español
中國人
Tiếng Việt
Deutsch
Українська
Português
Français
भारतीय
Türkçe
한국인
Italiano
Gaeilge
اردو
Indonesia
Polski This brief review highlights the best shared proxies of 2026, analyzed by implementation type, performance, geographic coverage, pricing, and management tooling. Capturing current market trends, it ultimately helps you choose the right network endpoint infrastructure aligned with your unique goals and business scale.
Depending on the usage model, proxy services generally fall into two classes: dedicated (individual) and shared. Dedicated ones are used in scenarios that require full isolation, traffic control, and an explicitly guaranteed SLA. Multi-user IPs are an efficient option for corporate tasks where the priorities are scalability, rapid rollout, and optimized operating costs.
Shared (or “public”) proxies are IP addresses used concurrently by multiple customers of the same provider to route network requests. Unlike dedicated options, this model implies multi‑tenant access to an IP pool, which lowers the per‑IP price and gives you flexible infrastructure scaling.
In corporate environments, the best shared proxies are used when partial loss of exclusivity is acceptable in exchange for budget efficiency. Typical use cases include shared proxies for scraping, price and competitor monitoring, brand reputation tracking (SERM), search results analysis (SERP), marketing tests, and large‑scale content research.
When it comes to the IP source, providers typically offer datacenter, mobile, and rotating residential multi-user endpoints. Each type has distinct properties suited to specific tasks. We previously covered what are shared proxies and how to select the right type for your business objectives, for those who want to find out more.
The core difference in a shared vs dedicated proxy setup is the IP usage model, but in practice, there are many other aspects worth considering when comparing the top shared proxy providers.
For enterprise users, connection stability directly affects internal workflows and software reliability. With multi-user solutions, one IP address is used by several clients, effectively operating as a proxy server with multiple users, which creates a “collective reputation” effect. Therefore, if one tenant exhibits suspicious activity (for example, sends too many requests without delays or hits protected APIs), the IP can be blocked.
Dedicated ones eliminate that risk: each IP is assigned to a single customer, preserving a clean reputation, predictable stability, and full control over connections.
Efficient distribution of network resources reflects the maturity of your infrastructure. In large companies, gateway servers are a control and analytics layer that ensures transparency of network flows, request accounting, and quality tracking.
Even with the best shared proxies, this level of transparency is somewhat limited. The provider keeps aggregated logs on their side that span multiple customers, which makes the data fragmented and unavailable for per‑tenant analysis or audit.
Dedicated connection points, by contrast, give you full operational control. All connections pass exclusively through your corporate segment, allowing system administrators and DevOps engineers to collect detailed HTTP/HTTPS logs, track request statistics, identify bottlenecks, regulate request frequency, and adjust CAPTCHA‑handling strategies.
Multi-user performance varies as speed depends on traffic load, network architecture, and the provider’s compute and routing resources, which is typically evaluated through a shared proxy speed test, along with geographic server distribution.
The best shared proxies offer users reliable large pools with dynamic rotation to reduce the risk of overloading specific networks, helping distribute traffic more evenly.
Dedicated intermediaries deliver stable, predictable performance. An IP (or an entire pool) is bound to a single client, ensuring consistent request handling, minimal latency, and steady throughput regardless of other users’ activity.
Pricing reflects IP exclusivity and the provider’s resource allocation model. Multi-user endpoints are cheaper because one network is used by multiple customers and infrastructure costs are distributed. Dedicated options are more expensive since each network is reserved for a single customer, and the provider bears the full cost of its maintenance and security.
Here’s a quick side‑by‑side comparison to better understand the key differences:
|
Parameter |
Shared |
Dedicated |
|---|---|---|
|
Usage Model |
Multi-user IPs |
Exclusive IPs |
|
Speed |
Variable, depends on network load |
Stable, high speed |
|
Security |
Basic |
Enhanced, private connection |
|
Reliability |
Higher risk of blocking |
Minimal risk of blocking |
|
Cost |
Low |
High |
|
IP Reputation |
May decline due to other users’ activity |
Controlled and maintained at a high level |
|
Scalability |
Easily expandable by number of IPs, but with less quality control |
Requires planning and financial investment, ensures stable IP quality and predictable network load |
|
Support |
Standard, automated |
Priority support with personalized configuration |
In corporate infrastructure, the best shared proxies act as a lever for cost optimization and smarter resource distribution. That’s why the key benefits of shared proxies include:
Modern providers offering the best shared proxies have also evolved into full technology ecosystems with load balancing, automatic IP rotation, and flexible integration with business processes.
There is no universal best shared proxy provider for every enterprise: requirements vary by business size, task profile, and budget. Large organizations prioritize reliability and SLAs, mid‑market teams favor flexibility and adaptability, while startups naturally seek the strongest feature‑to‑price ratio.
The best shared proxies combine performance, security, and cost. The providers below differ by geography, architecture, and pricing models, so you can match them to your unique use case.
Being a premium provider for small, mid, and enterprise teams, Proxy-Seller helps businesses build a solid network infrastructure with the best shared proxies, securely and efficiently. It offers multi-user and dedicated solutions, HTTP(S) and SOCKS5 support, and seamless scalability to meet any enterprise requirements.
The network spans 220+ countries, combining datacenter, residential, mobile, and ISP connection points. This enables analytics, automation, traffic auditing, testing, and digital asset management.
With a primary focus on stability, including 99% uptime, balanced load, and predictable throughput, Proxy-Seller offers the best shared proxies on the market, with solid IP reputation protection and connection predictability.
Key Characteristics:
A data‑collection provider oriented toward teams with high scalability needs. Bright Data offers one of the best shared proxies across all major types: datacenter, ISP, mobile, and residential.
The key differentiator is a comprehensive ecosystem. Beyond the global IP network, you get built-in tools for web scraping, parsing, and automated data analysis, making it a more convenient solution for teams working with analytics, marketing, research, and IT infrastructure.
Key Characteristics:
Another member of the best shared proxies, Oxylabs is heavily focused on the enterprise segment. Solutions are available as collective and dedicated, optimized for large‑scale projects with heightened traffic‑control and integration requirements.
A distinctive feature is Oxylabs’ own tool for data collection, structuring, and analysis, where multi-user solutions are purpose-built for those workflows.
Key Characteristics:
A reliable provider for small and mid‑sized businesses offering the best shared proxies at an accessible price, across all network types. This provider offers access to 125M+ IPs in over 195 countries.
DECODO targets customers who need broad geographic coverage and high throughput. The company invests in automation and enterprise integrations, which makes the service useful for monitoring, marketing analytics, testing, and data collection.
Key Characteristics:
Next in our list is SOAX, which stands out with extended protocol support — beyond HTTP(S) and SOCKS5, it also supports UDP and QUIC. This architecture enables resilient routing, low latency, and compatibility with systems where throughput and packet integrity are critical.
As a result, SOAX is used not only for scraping and automation, but also for streaming analytics, telemetry processing, API‑level A/B testing, financial monitoring, IoT infrastructure management, and synchronization of distributed services, all very relevant for companies operating high‑load networks and multi‑source data pipelines.
Key Characteristics:
The next network endpoint provider on our list is Webshare — a technology provider specializing in scalable network environments for enterprises and automated systems. The network covers 50 countries and delivers stable connection quality at high request throughput.
The architecture combines datacenter, residential, mobile, and ISP access nodes with fast rotation and unified access policies. There’s a REST API for integration, and a browser extension that simplifies central session management and traffic distribution.
Key Characteristics:
IPRoyal develops a network endpoint ecosystem geared toward precise flow control and flexible scaling of corporate operations. The platform coordinates distributed systems and can serve as a component in broader data‑routing and analytics solutions.
Collective access is built on rotating residential IP pools, which power shared residential proxies with adjustable refresh frequency.
This configuration works well for business scenarios that require continuous access to external sources, reliable sampling, and predictable load, from research analytics and content operations to verification and automated testing.
Key Characteristics:
P.S. Check out the top IPRoyal alternatives for 2026 and beyond.
A provider focused on implementation flexibility and cost efficiency. The service offers multi-user network endpoints tailored to applied business tasks where request processing speed and correct traffic routing are the priority.
It offers dedicated IPv6 networks, while its collective infrastructure is based on datacenter IPv4 addresses, supporting a true datacenter shared proxy model, billed per IP (traffic is not metered). This simplifies load planning and cost forecasting for large‑scale operations.
Key Characteristics:
To make selection easier, here is a side‑by‑side comparison to help you identify the best shared proxies for a specific project:
|
Provider |
Type |
Coverage |
Price |
Rotation |
Traffic |
Additional Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Proxy-Seller |
Datacenter, ISP, mobile, and residential |
220+ countries and regions |
From $0.7/GB |
By time or URL |
Unlimited |
Personal dashboard, software integration, geotargeting, documentation |
|
Bright Data |
Datacenter, ISP, Mobile, Residential |
190+ countries |
Pay-as-you-go or from $4/GB |
On request |
By volume (GB) |
Scraper, parser, anti-captcha tools, browser extensions, user-friendly interface |
|
Oxylabs |
Datacenter, ISP, mobile, and residential |
195 countries |
From $55/month or $8/GB |
Automatic rotation |
Unlimited, billed per GB |
Scraper, crawler, anti-bot browser, AI tools |
|
Decodo |
Datacenter, Residential, Mobile, ISP |
195 countries |
From $3/GB (Pay-as-you-go) |
By time and URL |
Unlimited |
Anti-detect browser X Browser, Chrome/Firefox extensions, API, documentation |
|
SOAX |
Datacenter, residential, mobile, ISP |
195 countries |
From $2/GB |
By time or session |
Limited by plan volume |
WebData API, SDK, and integration guidelines |
|
Webshare |
Residential and Datacenter |
195 countries and regions |
From $2.99/GB |
By time and URL |
Billed per GB |
Chrome / Firefox extensions, REST API, Web Unlocker |
|
IPRoyal |
Datacenter, residential, mobile, ISP |
195 countries and regions |
From $1.75/GB |
Automatic rotation by time |
By volume |
Web Unlocker, API, Chrome/Firefox extensions |
|
ProxyMarket |
Datacenter (IPv4) |
96 countries |
From $0.14/IP per day |
By time and URL |
Traffic depends on IP plan |
Personal dashboard, documentation, API integration |
We’ve explored the top providers offering the best shared proxies, but it’s also worth mentioning that there are several cheaper options out there. Depending on your business needs, cheap shared proxies might be sufficient, though, in most cases, their limitations will be noticeable.
Such intermediaries could be a rational choice for corporate scenarios that require fast scaling without heavy infrastructure investment. The model simplifies IP resource allocation and integration with existing systems.
The main constraints stem from the multi-user IP pool: performance may fluctuate and depend on other tenants’ activity. These factors are critical only where you need guaranteed throughput, isolated channels, and strict SLAs.
For most applied scenarios, such as testing, monitoring, analytics, regional checks, and supporting operations, low‑cost shared proxies remain both economical and operationally justified.
In the enterprise segment, multi-user solutions remain a true workhorse — primarily datacenter options with predictable performance and robust connectivity. The main downside is sensitivity to traffic‑filtering systems, which can limit effectiveness on heavily protected platforms.
Providers such as Proxy‑Seller, Bright Data, and IPRoyal deliver the best shared proxies via a hybrid approach, combining datacenter, mobile, and residential IPs with rotation, API integration, and traffic‑management tools. These solutions provide stable access to network resources and align with corporate expectations for control and security.
Prioritize mobile or residential IPs, apply time‑ or URL‑based rotation, and integrate network endpoints with anti‑detect browsers and related tooling that governs device fingerprints and connection anonymity.
Yes. A common pattern is to use multi-user IPs for auxiliary, high‑volume tasks and dedicated routing nodes for mission‑critical processes where maximum security and traffic control are required.
The most frequent errors involve poor load distribution and no IP rotation, which reduces connection efficiency. Teams also neglect session control and logging, apply datacenter IPs to tasks that are reputation‑sensitive, or skip anti‑bot and anti‑detect tools, all of which weaken network resilience.
Stable connectivity, IP rotation support, compatibility with core protocols (HTTP(S), SOCKS5), and API integration. The top offerings include not only datacenter but also residential or mobile IPs, delivering predictable performance, flexibility, and alignment with corporate governance and security.
Comments: 0